Just another WordPress.com weblog
In being so used, and even judged, solely for the practical interests of business, language in advanced industrial society becomes stilted and prescripted oppressively according to over-rigidly defined norms of economicorporate ‘common’ use:
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/massreception7/
All arts become subsumed in the industrial creation of culture’s illusion so that its artifacts receive disproportionate, unhealthy attention according to their socially construed value—as though immediate quality—in terms of its use.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/massreception6/
Negative ideology, in its archaic notions of intentionality-as-self, results in an emphasis on intent over meaning to the detriment of the human subject’s autonomy leading at a paralysis of will to act humanely at the cost of self-control.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/massreception5/
In reducing all cultural exchange to some form of practicality, the value of propositions in language becomes increasingly abstracted in referring to some idealized, pragmatic goal: So judgments become neutralized and ideology eclipses itself.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/massreception4/
The allure of this ever-reduplicating endeavor for profit is an arbitrary, but contextual, social construct occupying the functions of informing, entertainment—not enlightening—as distraction for the masses to mask its own dominance.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/massreception3/
In becoming hegemonic, either by force or that of wide-ranging—near universal—acceptance, the industrial commodification of cultural products grows eventually to pandemic proportions which blur lines between audience, fiction, producer.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/massreception2/
Mass culture, hardly fit to describe the contemporary order of contingencies in language games tending to enforce over-rigid standards of normativity based on convenience, market values deprive people of their freedom by the individuality which purportedy granted it leads to a continually consumerist socially but permanently reactionary culture which stifles creativity.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/massreception1/
As the project of Marx was a critique of historical necessity in looking at relations of exchange, one well criticizes the marxist position by providing it with a more sociological and humanistic foundation to describe its formulations in terms of subjective designations; basically, that the man has been bested on some points is no reason to throw out what wasn’t wrong.
That stuff Karl M. was saying, & writing, about industrial capitalism; yeah, well now people are doing—that’s tough—to works of art and writing even more widely it’s causing complications: When the production and creation of artistic endeavor’s link ties intimately in with the ideas to produce that dissemination is how culture becomes a debased mode of consumerist repetition.
Non-subjective inquiry into studying modes of perception leads to the basic problems of phenomenology in their systematic order as foundation: The scientific way of treating these problems and the idea of phenomenology is a name for the objective method of philosophy and traditional in general which is necessary to the construction of any scientific world view, provisionally.
