You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'synthetic' category.
Stud-ent
You guys need to understand: All
The threats & these reconciliations,
The social links, their references;
The massive investments of time
Educating the people around me
When all they have it’s one more
Simple question, ALL of it—ever-
Y last second, character and bit—
They’re oriented towards nothing
But getting the entire planet, in a
Certain sense, to leave me alone
Just so I can do my homework.
On a Fregean theory of meaning, rules of truth in Tarski’s form—e.g. ” ‘the world is round’ is true if and only if the world is round”—follow from the rules of denotation for sentences. For that a sentence is truth is taken to be the same as that it denotes true.
The difference between the political, spiritual and intellectual must reside in a theoretical process of pragmatism seeking scientifically in terms of metaphorical relation to re-assess its assumptions in light of ongoing experience, and that which is evidenced, in order to arrive at equivalencies in terminology so as to effect a discourse of analysis proposing its critique of value results as aesthetics.
philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/sensitivecompartment/
The increasing technical capacity of industrial culture, though affording a rising standard of living, also revolves around an exponentially concentrated degree of economic-as-political power in which social control—through public and private channels of observation indissociable from personal interest—lead reciprocally to (in justifying their continued use within and, or according to the selves) the obliteration of independence, freedom of speech expressive, change—hegemony.
As the project of Marx was a critique of historical necessity in looking at relations of exchange, one well criticizes the marxist position by providing it with a more sociological and humanistic foundation to describe its formulations in terms of subjective designations; basically, that the man has been bested on some points is no reason to throw out what wasn’t wrong.
Non-subjective inquiry into studying modes of perception leads to the basic problems of phenomenology in their systematic order as foundation: The scientific way of treating these problems and the idea of phenomenology is a name for the objective method of philosophy and traditional in general which is necessary to the construction of any scientific world view, provisionally.
While cherry-picking your evidence in order to arrive at a pre-determined conclusion is Satan’s every root of all evil, this is the only way to make a point in narrowing down the relevance of examples: Drawing targets around your arrows doth not true, an archer create.
Clear thinking declares the source of knowledge which is not innate and sets limits & rules for how to determine the validity of statements purporting to define the terms of questions and criteria for accepting answers.
“So wha’ do we talk to about here, are they connected by names or the entities having been called upon? If you think ‘both’ as the answer and not the question under investigation, and that’s all there is to it, perhaps we need to discuss your logic of definitions.”
Raising the question of science’s rationalizing objectivity in relation to the human capacity for understanding and interpretation results from the necessity of comparing words conceptually to other similar cases never the same.
