You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'analytic' category.

On a Fregean theory of meaning, rules of truth in Tarski’s form—e.g. ” ‘the world is round’ is true if and only if the world is round”—follow from the rules of denotation for sentences. For that a sentence is truth is taken to be the same as that it denotes true.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/gotochurch/

Atheism tending to be subservient to whoever’s in charge—some ostensible adherents of actual religions (apart from capitalism, though often as not in addition) actually do this worst of all—traditional moralists using a spiritualist front to promulgate their own subjective interpretation of religious doctrines so often result in dogmatic extremism (excluding the capitalist, for whom it is known as ‘good business’) they end up negating all one seeks to enforce.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/theisnt/

Untangling word-problems in language relevent to the real world of its problems requires the ability to apprehend difference in levels of meaning between expressions, describing, analysis—argument—and is always based on abstraction from material entities: Interpretation is the necessary element for making determinations about reality in going from ‘representation’ to “that’s a fact”

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/pauper/

 

Propositions must be accepted, rejected or questioned according to the logic and content of their assertions in context; though the use is an inseparable part inherent to their modality of expression, prohibiting certain of forms is useful only in preventing truth’s development.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/powercarnap/

Meaning’s concept is a non-subjective bundle of propositions as objective thoughts distinct from mental impressions; true, propositions can’t either represent or correspond to an independent reality, but rather are merely truth as foundation in fact.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/knowmoore/

“From its seeming to me—or to everyone—to be so, it doesn’t follow that it is so. What we can ask is whether it can make sense to doubt it.”

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/onewit/

Language is the sound of words expressing thoughts as abstracted sign to name communication, discover hidden reality and for arousing similar intentions in listeners—arising out of generally agreed upon notions of significant ideas.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/lockedown/

Individual instances of related objects which are perceptible cannot be other than matter as objects reference in time; they may be used to denote abstract networks of concept which one describes: Obviously these both referred two like terms.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/universallyparticular/

The archaic equivocation of work and worth in ideas of an author has historically been thought of as simply revealing truth of oneself, a notion’s being radically disintegrated in response to contemporary method of interpretations.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/athreeauteur/

The definifion of meaning can be determined logically according to a fixed set of criteria which recognize the difference between intention and significance. When unsure, context is used to determine the purpose. Each question of language entails a decision to be made: ‘Means’ meaning words.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/meantcondition/

True Reflections

A-bout

As two major approaches to analysis of literary work and the rather curious habit that people have of speaking and trying to figure out both has led we here at `Philologicum Aequaevum’ do undertake for you readers - at not one bit in cost to yourselves - even if not a few deep thinkers there amongst (and dare we not hoping those two could may- be found residing with one’s true frame?) prepared so on the level, and is daily as that serial—equally serious: Be a series of attempt to essay & summarize this current and bi-polar, fractured state of literary as if demographic’s form of social trend or even is a masturbatory exorcism of myster-ious lan-gauge to compel those fawning wants should let us force i’to them ‘tell you th’ what must mean.’