You are currently browsing the monthly archive for April 2008.

The archaic equivocation of work and worth in ideas of an author has historically been thought of as simply revealing truth of oneself, a notion’s being radically disintegrated in response to contemporary method of interpretations.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/athreeauteur/

Postructuralism is unified by its oddball insistence on using clever-sounding as’ rhetoric to cover up semi-intentional misrepresentations of basic, hard facts; yes, they mean well but are not aware ‘f it makes sense according to a clearly articulable logic (I’m, may-be missing something); Foucault, better than the rest.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/knowsubject/

Languistic capacity for symbolism is innate to human beings; this entails the enjoyment of states and in statements beyond ordinary experience & approaches the sublimity: Women do this too, just not the same as men & their TV’s.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/underthelimetree/

‘Though difficulty is to talk about’s things if one can-not first to describe how they built, it must not be said to comprise the “all” of that which ease into unknowable rea’m; so must we agree on may not be fully what would say, but allows the approach of meaning’s desired unfulfilled, able: A’ argue after which.’

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/lacunic/

Rampant, unchecked capitalism’s reactions have produced an essential split in conceptions of art and literature, as well as intellect (if not culture), so dedicated to essentialist notions of difference that nothing new is produced or now possible: It also reinforces, perhaps by resisting, this tendency.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/capit/

Making statements as a positive act doesn’t mean a rule can be derived about which kinds are good. Avoiding definitions is a bad way to make things relevant. Simply ironing out puzzles may not always solve a problem: ‘True’ may be a relation, but truth must correspond to some thing’s real.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/animalpragmatism/

Traditional examinations of perception in analyzing its role in distinction between socially constructed realities tend to define context in such a way as to polarize interpretations of motive; the real world as understood by human interaction between physical entities is rarely so simple.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/catchytitle/

College controversy’s a social conflict (probably from the ones arguing don’t understand where there are arguments derived). People who say this are listened to and despised; doesn’t seem to help the problem. Either way the schools end up dirty as hell. Education should learn about truth.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/storminormal/

The definifion of meaning can be determined logically according to a fixed set of criteria which recognize the difference between intention and significance. When unsure, context is used to determine the purpose. Each question of language entails a decision to be made: ‘Means’ meaning words.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/meantcondition/

The philosohical differences of action and potential ability are often reduced to idealized constructions of language, but a lot of terms have multiple associations which require limiting the specific sense: The actual use of statements is to clarify disputes through their usage in relation to each other.

philosophicumaequaevum.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/riled-up/

True Reflections

A-bout

As two major approaches to analysis of literary work and the rather curious habit that people have of speaking and trying to figure out both has led we here at `Philologicum Aequaevum’ do undertake for you readers - at not one bit in cost to yourselves - even if not a few deep thinkers there amongst (and dare we not hoping those two could may- be found residing with one’s true frame?) prepared so on the level, and is daily as that serial—equally serious: Be a series of attempt to essay & summarize this current and bi-polar, fractured state of literary as if demographic’s form of social trend or even is a masturbatory exorcism of myster-ious lan-gauge to compel those fawning wants should let us force i’to them ‘tell you th’ what must mean.’